The Boston Celtics are struggling. The Boston Celtics are old. The Boston Celtics are playing like the "pre-Big Three" Boston Celtics. They've lost five straight games for the first time since 2006-2007. The fan base is frantically searching for answers to the daunting question, "What's wrong with this team?" The final solution has not been provided, but as the season drags onward there have been glimpses of hope, moments of promise, and an ever-present truth. Paul Pierce is what will make or break this Boston team, it seems. As he continues to play better and better the Celtics will inevitably get stronger. How strong? I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Pierce entered this season injured. He sustained a heel bruise while working out this off-season, and it took him a bit longer than expected to recover. Pierce only managed to practice once during the entire training camp, and didn't even take the floor for Boston until the first home game against Detroit. By that point the C's had already started struggling. Granted, Boston eventually pulled to 4-4, but it's been downhill ever since.

During his time back on the floor it has become overly obvious that Pierce is both not in shape, and not completely healthy. Pierce had played a total of 292 (28.3 mpg average) minutes after Monday evening's game, and had pulled down 45 rebounds. He had tallied 32 assists, and 24 turnovers, seven steals, and two blocks. Most alarming out of those statistics are the turnovers, but please remember that Pierce took to the floor with one practice under his belt. He's essentially playing his way back to full health. In due time, those errors *should* take care of themselves.
Pierce is shooting 43-109 from the floor (39.4%) during his first nine games. Before his output against OKC he was averaging .88 points per play. Now, he is averaging .92 points per play. One of his most successful outputs (in plays ran five times or more) has been when he is coming off of the screen. Pierce is averaging 1.15 points per play off of the screen, and he is shooting 9-19 (47.4%) from the floor, 5-8 (62.5%) from three-point range. Pierce has been involved in spot-up opportunities during 32 plays, and he has shot only 8-26 (30.8%) from the floor. Paul has also been decently effective when he is involved in transition opportunities for Boston. He has been involved in 16 transition plays, and is averaging 1.19 points per play. Out of those 16 plays he has shot 5-12 (41.7%) from the field, 2-4 (50%) from beyond the arc. Through seven games Pierce was shooting 2-10 (20%) from 10-15 feet, and 3-20 (15%) from 16-23 feet. These numbers don't account for Pierce's decent performance against Indiana or the game on Monday against OKC, but they prove a pretty obvious point -- Pierce is not getting his shot in rhythm and in spaces where he can be effective (given the shape he is in at the point.) Instead, he is having to settle for contested jumpers and hasn't been able to get to the rim nearly as often as he would like to, probably. This has a direct correlation to the fact that he is not in shape yet, but it explains a good bit about his shooting woes so far this season. Yes, it is a small sample. But Pierce is obviously struggling to find his rhythm and get back into game shape. It isn't happening nearly as quickly as Doc and the rest of the coaching staff would have hoped, probably, and will definitely need to improve if the C's are to come anywhere close to the 8th playoff spot before the All-Star Break.
Defensively, Pierce has been decent. He has been the primary defender on 88 plays during his first nine games, and he is allowing .74 points per play. His match-ups are shooting 27-77 (35.1%) against him, 7-24 (29.2%) from deep. A potentially telling statistic, though, is the fact that out of the 11 times this season that Pierce has been the primary defender in isolation situations (a few times last night against Durant), he is committing a personal foul 36.4% of the time. Yes, this is a very small look at his numbers, but if those numbers remain consistent over time it will be interesting to see how the Celtics do as a result. Pierce has seemingly always been one of the C's top defenders in any situation since he has been in Boston. His struggles to stay in good position probably has a lot to do with his fitness and health, but it's at least something to note and keep an eye on.
While Pierce has been struggling during his first 8 games there have been moments where fans have been able to see the Boston Celtics they thought would be playing this season. You know, a team that plays sound defense, a team that capitalizes off of turnovers, and a team that will absolutely kill you coming off of screens. During those stretches it is Pierce (usually) who has the been the catalyst it seems. Rondo is the guy controlling the point, yes, but it's when Pierce is on the floor and getting his touches that the offense seems to run smoother than it was before, and the defense is far more sound than it ever was with Daniels, Pavlovic or anyone else playing (the SF position) with the first unit. As Pierce goes, so goes the Celtics. When he struggles it makes it awfully tough for Boston to maintain any type of consistency, especially on offense.
I don't think the Celtics are "done" yet. I don't think blowing it up is the right choice at this point. I think patience is key, though. After watching Pierce play for his first 9 games it is quite obvious that this team just wasn't ready (in my humble opinion) for the season to start. Pierce looks like he enjoyed his fair share of steak dinners during his time at Hotel de Lockout this summer, and not enough time running, lifting, and getting shots up. Then again, given the bleak outlook the lockout had at numerous times this off-season I can't say that I really blame him. Regardless, this is where the Celtics are at this point. Ray Allen is shooting well, Rajon Rondo is playing as well as he can with new teammates and rotations that seem to change every single game, and Kevin Garnett and Jermaine O'Neal have been holding their own as best as aging big-men can. Pierce is out of shape and not shooting well, but it will come. He has gotten considerably better as the season has progressed, and that is exactly what Doc Rivers was banking on when he decided to play him without conditioning work or practice. As long as the Celtics can remain (relatively) healthy, it isn't too far out of the question for Boston to rebound and start playing better.
Celtics fans know that this core group is far better than 4-8. Celtics fans know that Paul Pierce is the only guy outside of Rondo that can put his imprint on a game each and every night and essentially will the team to victory. Celtics fans understand that this season is far from over. The outlook at this point is grim, but if there is any solution on Boston's current roster it is Paul Pierce. For better or for worse. As his fitness improves we can hold out hope that his shot will as well, and Boston's shackles will hopefully loosen. After all, "The Truth" can set you free.
0 recs | 36 comments
There is green blood dripping from my iPhone. Great read. I love this blog.
Time will tell. Unfortunately, it waits for no one.
johnnymost - January 17, 2012 via mobile
Im gunna say
Ray allen is the problem guys.. Trust me. The C’s playbook revolves too much around setting screens for Ray and there was a time it worked. But now Ray coming off the screen either fumbles the pass, throw a careless pass and cannot get the space to get his shot off. Now he tries driving in which ends up in TO’s. cant wait for that trade deadline because we need to get anyone else and get rid of Ray.
celtz_believer - January 17, 2012 via Android app
Are you kidding?!
Ray is not the problem!! Ray is averaging 16.5 pts and shooting lights out – 51FG%, 57 3Pt% and 88% FT as well as 2 TO a game. Heck, Doc would like Ray to shoot more. And yes the bigs set screens for Ray and the other guards and wings, that has been standard for the team in the Big 3 Era. It not only gets the guard or wing open, it gets the big shots to, against smaller players. That what is called and offense, not going one-on-one like Miami, Chicago or many other teams. The guy who isn’t taking advantage of his mismatches is KG.
In fact, if you really want to blame one guy, why not KG. He can’t seem to make a layup, how many bunnies has he missed this young season. And he can’t seem to guard anyone either, it seems to me that Carl Landry scored at will, Amare didn’t have any problems scoring over him, and then there’s Dirk took taking him to the bucket for the game winner. And he’s not rebounding that well either.
IMO, the big problem is the lack of ball movement. There’s way too much dribbling. And they aren’t running there is little or no fast breaking.
BTW, I’m not blaming anyone. KG will continue to play his heart out, just like the rest of them, so it hard to BLAME any one guy. And I’ll bet there aren’t pointing fingers. The problem is we just aren’t playing very good. Hopefully, we’ll snap out of it and get back to Celtics basketball!
Me, I’m still praying for a banner but know it’s not realistic.
badax33 - January 17, 2012
nice
Even though I am part of the doom and gloom society growing here these days I agree.
If this team has any shot of making any noise this season, make the post season and make some noise once they get there it depends on Paul Pierce being the Paul Pierce we saw last season. It would open up things for Rondo and Ray and help alleviate the scoring droughts that have plagued this teams since last season.
CelticsFanNC - January 17, 2012
one year too many
He is the same Paul Pierce, but he’s yet one year older, and very late in his career. This is typical of a few others on this team. You just start to slow down.
green solution - January 17, 2012
Or maybe, maybe... You're just making excuses.
Although I agree the team is gonna get better with Pierce coming back to his playing form, I really disagree with the view that the team is gonna find its old groove back just like that.
The problem is deeper than Pierce being out of shape. As we have seen in the last PO, the big 3 can’t match the young dogs anymore, even with their legendary teamplay. KG is not gonna find back his 20 years old legs back; Pierce is not that go-to guy in the clutch who can create his own shot anymore. Ray can shoot the ball, but he still can’t do anything else and is too old to defend 35min on the top SGs. What about the bench and the weak rotation inside? Pierce finding his rythm back doesn’t solve all those problems.
In your long article, you never say the word “championship”. Imo, we can write all we want, the fact is this team is done championship-wise. Sure, they are probably better than 4-8, but they don’t have what it takes to beat the top teams. They are not contending, they are only competing.
lepooo - January 17, 2012
Enjoyed that MJ commercial reference
Watch it here:
I guess the primary reason I never mentioned a championship is because I felt it was a foregone conclusion/assumption that this team looks like a competitor, not a contender. I’ve made the argument before that getting into the playoffs will make any team a contender (especially a veteran team like the C’s), but at this point I can’t even call this team that — they’re playing that badly. Sure, we’re 12 games in, but I can’t use that term (championship or contender) about a team that isn’t even remotely looking like a playoff team AT THIS POINT. Hopefully that will improve as the schedule gets a bit better for the next week or so.
JoshZavadil - January 17, 2012
I am sure they are gonna improve
The shortened (but somehow longer for the bodies) season is hurting them big time, as well as the almost non existent preseason.
But on the other hand, I am equally sure they are not contending in 2012, even if they can manage to win against Phoenix, Toronto and Washington. I hope DA can play it smart before the deadline, making 1 or 2 trades to start the rebuilding process without hurting the fans too much. The more they loose, the easier it will be PR-wise I guess.
lepooo - January 17, 2012
funny
my once laughable 28-win prediction may yet prove optimistic
Al Woodal - January 17, 2012
avery bradley
might be the celtics worst shooting point since, well, heavens, I’m not sure.
Dirk Minnifield?
Al Woodal - January 17, 2012
Ha ha—Dirk Minnifield!
clover - January 17, 2012 via mobile
Gabe Pruitt wasn't that long ago.
KY Celts fan - January 17, 2012
Out of Shape
I do not necessarily disagree with anything you said. But, what does being out of shape say to the fans? Even if Pierce’s contract was for only 1 million a year, that is still more than what many of the loyal fans will make over their working lifetime. To me, there is no excuse short of a medical condition that excuses showing up out of shape.
Ray Allen is getting a lot of flak (undeserved) about his play. One thing is for certain though, he does not show up not ready. If the lockout had been 6 months shorter or 6 months longer, he would have been in game shape.
If Pierce is not healthy, then that is one thing. Anyone has limited control over their health. If Pierce is out of shape, then that is a different reality. On no level is it acceptable, especially from the team captain.
DENNEE - January 17, 2012
True.
It isn’t something any fan can take solace in, but it doesn’t detract from the fact that it’s what he is dealing with it seems. He isn’t the only player around the league who is out of shape. But he is definitely one of the only players who means as much to his team as any star player. You can blame it on laziness, you can blame it on his injury, or you can blame it on the lockout. The fact of the matter is he isn’t fit, and until he is back into game shape he will continue to struggle to find his rhythm and such.
JoshZavadil - January 17, 2012
i agree with what you say
ray is always fantastic and always in game shape.
i believe pierce would have been in game shape, but from what ive heard the injury he had on his heels hurts as hell and takes a lot of time to heal. as such both pierce and celtics fans have to be patient until he returns to game shape.
i mean you step on your heels every second your on the floor, thats got to hurt when you have an injury.
ZM15 - January 17, 2012
it's similar to the plantar faciitis that Rondo had last year and it indeed can be excruciating.
It’s like playing with a sharp rock in your shoe.
mmmmm - January 17, 2012
PP
out of shape and playing poker in the off season who’s fault ……. blame it on the heel ….
juanpan - January 17, 2012
Dennee
I think PP was probably in decent shape when he came to camp but not NBA Game shape, that’s what training camp is for. I don’t know when he hurt his heel, but that’s a touch injury for a wing player.
I think one of PP’s problems is that he forces the action, and when he’s in shape he can get away with it. But now that he’s out of shape he can’t. I think that explains his high turnover rate.
We really need to get back to Celtics ball and moving the ball. That’s really what’s missing. We see good ball movement 7,8 maybe 10 times a game. The rest of the time the ball in being pounded into the ground along with our offense.
One other thing is that KG is badly mismatched in the post. Lots of finger rolls rather than taking the ball up strong. I would have thought that Kevin M would have taught him better in the post. KG needs to keep the ball high, fakes and power moves
badax33 - January 17, 2012
he is out of shape because he was hurt and couldnt run!
mdowell04 - January 17, 2012
Look, the offense is pretty average but that was kinda to be expected even if with the offensive acquisition of Bass but what allowed for the average offensive play was the great defense.
There is none of that this year—the rotations are either too slow or just not there, the ferociousness of the frontcourt is long gone, and the clutch defensive stops aren’t there anymore. KG still plays fantastic defense, but his quickness and explosiveness are pretty much gone and he now seems to completely relies on footwork and smarts (which is fine, but might not be enough). Of course, the fact that they’ve more or less completely revamped the bench doesn’t help the chemistry but even the starting five don’t seem to be playing up to par (someone can look up the stats for me to be positive) on the defensive end.
Right now the Celtics are below average offensively (which isn’t that surprising) but also defensively, which is what is really killing them in my mind.
muckduck - January 17, 2012
This is the first time I have read that Pierce was injured during the offseason
Everything to date I have read said he was injured the first or second day of practice. I agree they will be better as Pierce gets better, but don’t think they will be good enough to do anything in the playoffs.
vinnie - January 17, 2012
You are correct
I apologize about that. Completely my fault. Misunderstood what I read about his injury — it was sustained during the first practice session of training camp.
JoshZavadil - January 17, 2012 via iPhone app
Trade Ray
celtz_believer - January 17, 2012 via mobile
Celtics outlook -
Can they improve? Yes. They may even be a .500 or slightly better team. Can they compete for a championship? No. Not remotely.
So, then the question is only about your rebuilding plan. What do you think you can have next year and beyond. If it’s better to keep the big 3 – e.g., by signing KG or Allen to much-reduced contracts as role players – then do that. If it’s better to trade for picks or young guys, then do that. Either way, the Cs aren’t competing for a title with this core again.
Sophomore - January 17, 2012
The 10 game winning streak....
Starts Now… look at the sched…
David Henderson - January 17, 2012
So they are going to beat Orlando twice, including once in Orlando, Indiana and the Knicks
I would be thrilled with 7-3, but expect 6-4 in these 10 games. Lose at Cleveland, at Orlando, to the Packers and to the Knicks.
vinnie - January 17, 2012
That would be correct....
Except for the Packers… they’re out…LOL but, yeah we’ll beat the Pacers too….
10 and 0…
David Henderson - January 17, 2012
this morning
i said contenders would begin calling about the big three, and, just now, check out the Army.
What i said is already true.
damn I’m good.
Picks and players.
The Big 3, even at their advanced ages, ought to be good for something
Al Woodal - January 17, 2012
Truth
"These are dog days man, really,’’ Garnett said. "We’re going to see who’s fair weather, who’s with you. Whatever Doc’s going to do, we’re going to support all the way.
The green mamba - January 17, 2012 via mobile
I guess the word LOYALTY doesnt carry much weight around here.
The green mamba - January 17, 2012 via mobile
Here we go again. Can't we just stop the labeling crap?
vinnie - January 17, 2012
you do it every post
mdowell04 - January 17, 2012
let's just enjoy the present.
and hope for the best.
Snowball - January 17, 2012
TRADE Ray
celtz_believer - January 17, 2012 via mobile
YeS! lets trade PP for Blake Griffin!
Yeah right buddy!!! the NBA does not work like that! David POS Stern rewards LOSERS! Since the LA Fakers have their own farm team (clippers) that play in the same place. Give me a stinking break you hosers! We are Celtics! We leave it all out there! you bash your head off the parkay you shake it off and make the free throws. No one is giving anything for pierce! Time To SCOUT!!! you look for talents and find them instead of being lazy, disloyal executive scumbags trying to destroy a franchise.
Leprachaun in da hood - January 17, 2012
I think are Big 3 are fine, maybe KG is off, but he will get better, Ray is doing good, Paul will get better to, 28 minutes a game is where he needs to be for now, and his back-ups are doing their job, KG’s back-ups doing theirs, the problem is we need a big man, and we probably will get someone soon, have some patience, we have a veteran team, they know what they are doing, maybe we should try playing KG at center and start Bass at PF, I would have tried that for couple of games and if that didn’t work we always could put KG back at PF
Steve Kol - January 18, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of CelticsBlog to post a comment.